Words from a wise man
Posted by: prembio
Post title: Words from a wise man
Date: 09/04/2026, 05:06:33
Original URL: Click here (However, the link may be stale.)

One very public premie that I never would have thought of as a practised seducer of women and sexual stud is Mitchell Ditkoff who has spent 50 years writing about his great love for the bare chested Maharaji. Who could forget his article Dance, Dance, Dance? Dance, Dance, Dance

I know some of you will not want to read the whole article so I'll cut to the chase:

"It was confronting to admit it, but the part of my relationship to Maharaji that I had fabricated was becoming undone. Without knowing it, I had become a fan and a groupie in addition to being a student. Like my previous strategy in my personal life of creating short-term love affairs to keep me feeling studly, I had been orchestrating my relationship with Maharaji to provide well-timed payoffs. Did it work? Yes it did. But it went only so far."

Waiting for Maharaji

Since Maharaji first came to the West in 1971, tens of thousands of people have received Knowledge and become his students. Conversely, a large number of these same people    along the way    have decided to disassociate from him. That, of course, is their right. Their reasons have been many, everything from objecting to his lifestyle to an unsupportive spouse to the personality of some of Maharaji's representatives. I understand this phenomenon. It has happened to a number of my friends. Indeed, on a few occasions, it almost happened to me. At its core, I believe, the rejection of Maharaji by some of his students has a lot to do with what the more conventional religions would term "making God in our own image." We get an idea in our heads and then we compare reality to it. Psychologists refer to this as "projection." The result? Disappointment, disillusionment, and ultimately, anger.

Allow me to be more specific.

The year was 1983 and I was living in Los Angeles. Although I had enjoyed some wonderfully casual moments with Maharaji throughout the years, most of my contact with him had been at big programs, him on stage, me straining to see from the mezzanine, wondering how to get a better seat. Like most of his students I wanted "special" time with him, away from the crowds.

And so when a friend asked me to be a waiter at a party Maharaji was throwing for his neighbors I jumped at the chance. I rented the outfit. I shined my shoes. I showed up early. Nobody but my mother could have guessed I wasn't a waiter by profession.

And then, with a signal from the caterer, my adventure began    silver tray of hors d'oeuvres in my hand    spreading out with the rest of the waiters among the guests, each according to our designated areas.

The first thing I saw was Maharaji. Technically speaking, he wasn't in my zone, but since none of the other waiters were approaching him, I decided to fill the void. This was my chance, I reasoned    especially since I hadn't talked to him for more than three years.

Maharaji pulled his head back, looked away, and extended his hand in a slow, downward motion as if to say, "Keep that thing away from me!"

I smiled and continued on my way, wondering if his refusal had any kind of cosmic significance. Was it me or the pizza puffs? Was he seeing some deep, ancient flaw in me? Was I hopelessly uncool? Fortunately, the day was too beautiful to obsess on my thoughts for long and so I kept moving until I located my area in the field behind his house.

From where I was now positioned, there were absolutely no sight lines to the party, no chance to see, I thought, Maharaji. The only things interesting to look at were the ocean and the sky.

And so it was. Every ten minutes or so a few guests would make their way back to my area, surprised to see a waiter standing in a field so far from the party.

It took about ten guests to empty my tray. After that I would head back to the waiters' shed for refills. This must have happened at least 20 times during the day and each time it did, Maharaji would somehow enter my field of vision    standing, talking, eating, walking, and doing all the things a person normally does at a party. And though I could never predict what he was going to be doing when I saw him, I could predict the feeling I would have. "Jazzed" is how I would refer to it. Pumped. Buzzed. Blissed. I was a curious hybrid of boy seeing Santa and a Grateful Dead groupie with a lifetime backstage pass. "It's him," I would think to myself again and again. "Him!"

The Scene and the Unseen
This little scene played itself out several times during the day. But then something unexpected happened.

About the 20th time I saw him, I felt nothing. Zero. Nada. Zilch. An unwelcome sense of normalcy began to take me over. Seeing him was suddenly no big deal. I wasn't awed, I wasn't amazed. Neither was I captivated, astounded, excited, glad, grateful, inspired, delighted, or energized. I wasn't anything.

My concept of Maharaji was being deconstructed before my eyes. My "mental model" wasn't working. Something I had counted on for years    that seeing him would always be "uplifting"    was no longer operational. Was it him? Was it me? Was it both of us? Neither? Something else?

Conclusions 'R Us
One conclusion I could have easily drawn was that Maharaji was nothing special    a Wizard of Oz made great only by my neurotic projections. Yes, if I wanted proof that he was all hype now I had it. But having received Knowledge from him 12 years earlier and experienced the many benefits of it in my life, I could not bail out at such a conclusion. Something else was clearly going on.

Looking back, my "buzzless" series of waitering moments at Maharaji's party felt like the unceremonial end of my extended honeymoon with him    that formerly delightful time of spiritual romance in which I had been protected from (or blinded to) the moments in which one's "significant other" does not appear very extraordinary. In marriages, this either marks the beginning or the end of the painful acceptance of the apparent mundane    the time when the husband no long seems heroic and the wife is no longer seen as "goddess."

It was confronting to admit it, but the part of my relationship to Maharaji that I had fabricated was becoming undone. Without knowing it, I had become a fan and a groupie in addition to being a student. Like my previous strategy in my personal life of creating short-term love affairs to keep me feeling studly, I had been orchestrating my relationship with Maharaji to provide well-timed payoffs. Did it work? Yes it did. But it went only so far.

I was not alone. Lots of Maharaji's students have set him up in this way. Ruled by the very human need to define, we turned him into many things: a superstar, a hero, an Avatar, an anthropomorphized version of our own private God    projecting all kinds of images on him, not unlike small children do with their parents or teachers.

Inevitably, this leads to disappointment. Which leads to doubt. Which leads to anger. And it is this anger born from the gap between who he is and who we imagine him to be that is often the reason why some students of Maharaji eventually reject him. "He is not who I thought he was," they claim. And of course it is true, because, in many ways, it is impossible to know Maharaji (or anyone else for that matter) through the medium of thought.

Watching Our Own Movies
More relationships are ruined, I believe, by expectations than by anything else. Husbands do it to their wives. Wives do it to their husbands. Parents do it to their kids. The Master/Student relationship is no exception. Somehow we get it into our heads that a Master has to be a certain way. Casting directors in our own B movie, we patch together our favorite stereotypes and create a picture of how the Master should be, what he should do, what he should say    and then proceed to compare everything to this picture.

Of course, we're going to be disappointed. How could it be any other way? The alternative? Live and let live. Be who you are and let Maharaji be who he is. Give up the addiction to having everyone and everything fit the Procrustean bed of your spiritualized imagination. If you're a student of Maharaji's, allow your experience of him to arise from the practice of Knowledge rather than your needy projections. If you are interested in receiving Knowledge, trust your instincts and take the next step. And if you're a disgruntled ex-student of Maharaji's, stop for a moment and ask yourself how your new mission to save the world from him compares to your previous commitment    years ago    (using Maharaji as your perfect poster boy) to save the world from itself.


Mitch Ditkoff
August 14, 2001


Re: Words from a wise man
Posted by: lakeshore
Post title: Re: Words from a wise man
Date: 09/04/2026, 08:39:13
Original URL: Click here (However, the link may be stale.)
Mitch Ditkoff?

Ain't he the blind apologist who gopied-out when he said ashram premies chose celibacy as part of THEIR path to enlightenment, ignoring the fact that none other than the Lord Himself dictated it as the best way to realize His Knowledge... ignoring the mental and emotional coercion resulting from the fact that not accepting celibacy was tantamount to ignoring or disobeying "Guru Maharaji, the Lord, All powerful," Prem Rawat's words, not mine?

Oh, and ain't he the one who goped-out another time when he said the (lifetime vow of poverty, chastity and obedience to Prem Rawat) ashrams (with their forced family and relationship breakups, social engineering, contraband crusades, inheritance theft and darkest of all threats for ever leaving)... were no more onerous than little league or summer camp?

Anyway, notice how Mitch mentions normal societal breakups and ignores the forced breakups orchestrated by Prem Rawat who delighted in going so far as to separate couples to opposite ends of the country, transferring them like the property they were.

"...we patch together our favorite stereotypes and create a picture of how the Master should be, what he should do, what he should say - and then proceed to compare everything to this picture... Be who you are and let Maharaji be who he is."

How about finding the courage, integrity and dignity to patch together a picture of how the Master should NOT be, what he SHOULD NOT do and what he SHOULD NOT say... the factual picture of who and how he actually is? Then ask yourself what ignoring it says about who and how you are. Would you ever for a moment have excused it or made more of an effort to irrationally rationalize it away than to acknowledge the truth before you met him? What's it like to have to keep a cup full of close pins next to you when you practice so as to stick one on your nose to block the smell?

(Fortunately, my "making a list" days in support of my words are behind me - my posts were too long.)

Seems to me that as wise as Mitch is, he has gopi-like symptoms of willfully ignoring far to many things.


Re: Words from a wise man
Posted by: 13
Post title: Re: Words from a wise man
Date: 09/04/2026, 12:16:37
Original URL: Click here (However, the link may be stale.)
That's so disingenuous, to suggest that our worship of Rawat was a matter of us projecting our idea of God onto him.

As if he was a blank canvas for us to project onto.

A blank canvas, bare-chested, baggy orange trousers, a mala, a huge crown and a flute. He didn't paint his skin blue, but it was pretty obvious what image he was trying to project onto us.

Phewey Mr Ditkoff.

Re: Words from a wise man
Posted by: lesley
Post title: Re: Words from a wise man
Date: 09/04/2026, 14:32:50
Original URL: Click here (However, the link may be stale.)
Mitch sounds like a such a gopi.

I suppose still being one all this time later is his karma.

Re: Words from a wise man
Posted by: tommo
Post title: Re: Words from a wise man
Date: 09/04/2026, 15:50:11
Original URL: Click here (However, the link may be stale.)
"And it is this anger born from the gap between who he is and who we imagine him to be that is often the reason why some students of Maharaji eventually reject him. "He is not who I thought he was,"



A wonderful example of contorted premie logic - 

Anyone adopting a 'teacher' must initially do so on trust and therefore at least imagine that the teacher is a 'good thing'. 

But if it then turns out that the teacher is actually a 'bad thing'  then the sane response is to stop the lessons and advise others to avoid. 

The insane response is to so lack self confidence that rather than doubting the 'bad' teacher you doubt yourself and contort reality so far as to believe that 'bad' might be 'good' - and then further imagine the contortion as a privileged insight and a personalised lesson from your teacher - with whom - in some imaginary plane you have 'a relationship'


Such irony that Mitch blames  'imagination' as the reason for disillusionment with Rawat when imagination is the only thing that maintains the illusion that Rawat is a 'teacher'. 


Poor Mitch

"Always leave room for doubt in your mind"