Don't forget to rate this post down below!


Editor's Note: Yes, more on the subject of THE LETTER. See ***Best of Forum*** A response to THE Letter for THE LETTER.

Date:

Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 05:43:41 (EDT)

From:

Sir Dave/TD>

Email:

To:

'biggest asshole'

Subject:

Here's another invasion of privacy
Message:

It was an invasion of privacy to be told by Rawat to cease all personal relationships and love him solely, because he was the living Lord. It was a massive intrusion into the personal lives of many people who gave up relationships with their husbands/wives, boyfriends/girlfriends and children to live a sterile life and literally blow their whole lives, all for a selfish, pompous liar, who now hasn't got the guts to admit that he made a mortal error in messing around with the lives of thousands of young people.


Date:

From:

Deputy Dog

Email:

To:

Jean-Michel

Subject:

Yellow tabloid journalism
Message:
Jean-Michel aka Monsieur Fromage,

What a cheezy thing to do, to print Marilyn's personal letter. Why did you do it? Because 'inquiring minds' want to know? Will the Forum soon be showing pictures of two headed babies. Cheddar, Camenbert, Danish Blue, Pont Leveque . . . cheezy, cheezy, cheezy tabloid journalism.

Stick to vaccinating dogs or whatever it is the fuck you do, you asshole!


Date:

Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:04:26 (EDT)

From:

Jean-Michel

Email:

To:

Deputy Dog

Subject:

Re: Yellow tabloid journalism
Message:
Can't you read English?

I've done this on the recipent's behalf, cause she knows the existence of this forum, she's not online, and wants the letter to be published and accessible to anybody.

She's the one who's been deeply hurt, and she wants everybody to see how the Rawats treated her!

THEY didn't do a single thing to help her out, when they could!

That's why.


Date:

Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 20:15:35 (EDT)

From:

Deputy Dog

Email:

To:

Jean-Michel

Subject:

Re: Yellow tabloid journalism
Message:
Can't you read English?

I've done this on the recipent's behalf, cause she knows the existence of this forum, she's not online, and wants the letter to be published and accessible to anybody.

She's the one who's been deeply hurt, and she wants everybody to see how the Rawats treated her!

THEY didn't do a single thing to help her out, when they could!

That's why.


---
Jean Michel,

Cheesemiester, you printed the letter and it was in invasion of privacy. It seems the Rawats treated her fine. What did she want, advice? My advice is to just surrender and meditate. Relax. Let it be, there will be an answer, let it be. That was the answer.

It was a breach of privacy.


Date:

Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 23:14:45 (EDT)

From:

Jethro

Email:

To:

Deputy Dog

Subject:

Re: Yellow tabloid journalism
Message:
'My advice is to just surrender and meditate. Relax. Let it be, there will be an answer, let it be. That was the answer. '

That's right.......just like Derek Bentley's family did.....they just waited and everything was okay!!!!

Has every premie got this problem with dealing with facts?

You have the impertinance to make an issue about 'invasion of privacy'.

Are you as disgusted with prempal for, for example,for breaking promises to ashramees and throwing them out onto the street? 

5 Brighter than 1000 suns as seen through night vision goggles
4 As bright as the lights on Maharaji's jet
3 As bright as a 60 watt light bulb
2 As bright as a pile of burning ghi on a swinging arti tray
1 As bright as the inner light as seen by the third eye
Other